I’m concerned that there is often a false dichotomy presented between privacy and security:
“It’s vital to understand that privacy and security, while often mentioned together, are not one and the same. Privacy demands security, but security does not demand privacy. Historically, privacy has often been violated in the name of security.”
In this context, I can’t quite tell if the author is talking about “secure communications”, rather than, say, “domestic security”. One could easily say: “(communication) security has often been violated in the name of (domestic) security.”
Perhaps we could define our terms more clearly.
But I still think there’s truth in the article: people’s privacy and communications security is dependent on a certain degree of law and order, yet is often violated in service of that same law and order.
Edit: Copy and paste error. I adapted this from a post to the Cyber101x forums on edX.